ice, ice baby. gotta abolish ice and have warm chaos!

“Abolish ICE”: When the Message Was Hot, But the Strategy Was Frozen

Another day, another slogan that makes a good idea sound like a threat. And today’s icy disaster is brought to you by:

ABOLISH ICE.

Yes. Abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement—the agency formed in 2003 as part of the post-9/11 security frenzy and which somehow evolved into a turbo-charged deportation machine with the subtlety of a wrecking ball and the compassion of a DMV possessed by a ghost from Schindler’s List.

Was it absolutely necessary to call attention to ICE's abuses? Yes.
Did we need to push back against family separation, deportation quotas, and treating every immigrant like a cartel leader in disguise? Also yes.
Did we have to call it “abolish ICE” and send half the country into a panic attack? Apparently… yes?

What Was Meant: “Hey, This Agency Is Out of Control”

ICE under Trump (and to a lesser extent under previous presidents too) became notorious for:

Ripping children from their parents and losing track of them like they were USB drives,
Raiding workplaces at dawn and terrorizing entire communities,
Detaining asylum seekers indefinitely in privately-run facilities that made Motel 6 look like the Ritz.

Activists saw this and thought:

“This isn’t working. This system needs to be dismantled, reimagined, and replaced with something humane.”

But instead of saying that, they screamed:

“ABOLISH ICE!”

And moderate America heard:

“So we’re just not doing border security now? Cool, cool. Should I cancel my passport and just print one at Kinko’s?”

What Could’ve Been Said (But Wasn’t):

“Reform immigration enforcement.”
“End family separation policies.”
“Hold ICE accountable.”
“Dismantle Trump-era detention policies.”

All of which would’ve:

Made sense,
Not induced panic in swing states,
Still addressed the real problem.

But no—activism said, “Let’s light the whole acronym on fire and see what happens.”

Political Fallout: Predictable as Hell

Republicans responded with the usual calm and grace:

“Democrats want open borders, free iPhones for MS-13, and sanctuary cities where ICE agents are hunted for sport.”

And what could Democrats say?

Some distanced themselves:
“I don’t support abolishing ICE, just, uh… a more humane version of ICE?”

Others doubled down:
“No human is illegal! Also, abolish all borders!”

Meanwhile, people who just wanted a reasonable, lawful, and compassionate immigration system quietly backed away, holding their U.S. passports like crucifixes.

The Real Ice-Cold Truth

Here’s what got lost in the shouting:

The U.S. does need immigration enforcement—but not the kind that looks like a militarized kidnapping squad.
ICE has been given way too much power with too little oversight.
There are better models that prioritize human rights, smart prioritization, and actual due process.
No one wants criminals running free—but most people deported were not violent criminals. They were parents, workers, students, and people seeking refuge.

But none of that nuance fits on a protest sign or goes viral in 280 characters.

Final Thoughts: Can We Cool It With the Branding?

“Abolish ICE” didn’t mean chaos.
But it sounded like chaos.
And in politics, sounding like chaos is often worse than actual chaos.

You want people to join the cause, not run from it screaming “they’re coming for the Constitution!”

So here’s a humble proposal:

Want ICE to stop abusing human rights? Great.
Want a rational, just immigration system? Absolutely.
Want to yell “abolish ICE” without clarifying what replaces it? Maybe… don’t?

In Conclusion: Reform the System. Keep the Message from Sounding Like a Revolution Run by Tumblr.

If you’ve made it this far, you’re probably not trying to deport people for existing—but you also don’t want to abolish every federal agency with a problematic record. That’s growth, baby.

Let’s push for:

Immigration reform that’s smart, humane, and enforceable.
Messaging that doesn’t sound like a fever dream written by someone on a caffeine cleanse and a Marxist TikTok binge.

Because real change requires real strategy.
And catchy slogans should help the cause—not freeze it in place.

3 chapters on male victims of rape in my BEYOND LABELS

Chapter 4 Rape Why does this concern me and why should it matter to me? Because it exists, it happens to men as it does to women. Everywhere you look; billboards talk about female victims of DV, human trafficking, SA, and rape. Pushing the narrative that men are abusers, rapists and pedophiles. A small minority of men commit those crimes and a small number of women do too. It’s a human issue and yet society treats it like it only happens to women, never men. It’s not a wonder why men don’t report their abuse, their rape to anybody. Crime documentaries talk about female rape victims almost always but never mention a single male victim of rape. Law and order and CSI touch on that sometimes, but no one seems to be too concerned. Male victims of DV, SA, and rape happened a lot more often than people realize, but crime shows never want to touch on that subject. It is because they want to keep pushing the narrative: “Men bad, women good.” Movies and...

Going my own way

Search This Blog