Skip to main content

"You do not deserve free healthcare!"

 “You don’t have a right to free health care. Because you don’t have a right to the labour that it takes to provide healthcare itself. And you don’t have a right to the labour that it takes to pay taxes that will pay for that healthcare. You only have a right to things that are inherent to you that can’t be taken away. Like your right to free speech, your right to freedom of religion. You don’t have a right to require other people to work to pay taxes to pay for things that you don’t want to pay for.”

 

The assertion that individuals do not have a right to free healthcare because it requires the labor of others and taxpayer funding is a flawed argument rooted in misconceptions about work, entitlement, and basic human rights. This perspective not only ignores the fact that many people who receive free or subsidized healthcare are contributing members of society, but also perpetuates harmful stereotypes about the desire for social support.

Firstly, the idea that recipients of free healthcare are not contributing to the system is simply untrue. Many individuals who access free or low-cost healthcare programs, such as Medicaid in the United States, work in low-wage jobs that do not provide health insurance. These individuals pay taxes, contribute to their communities, and are often caught in a cycle of poverty that makes health insurance inaccessible despite their employment. The notion that they do not have a right to healthcare because they do not work ignores their participation in the tax base that funds these programs. It also overlooks the fact that healthcare access enables people to work productively and care for their families, creating a positive feedback loop in the economy.

What happens when your employee works and gets sick or injured? They’re out of luck. Also, it ignores that they need medications for many things that can help them be more productive in their employment. Why would you want to take that away from them?

Secondly, the argument against a right to healthcare relies on the false and damaging stereotype that people merely want to receive free things without effort. This "welfare cheat" narrative has been thoroughly debunked by research, yet persists in discourse around healthcare and other social programs. In reality, navigating the eligibility processes for free healthcare programs is complex and time-consuming, deterring many who are legally qualified from applying. Furthermore, the immense paperwork and administrative burdens placed on healthcare providers participating in these programs reflect a system designed to create barriers, not invite abuse. The desire for healthcare access is rooted in the fundamental human need for medical care, not laziness or a desire for handouts.

Finally, the assertion that only inherent rights like free speech and religion should be protected, while basic needs like healthcare are earned, is a morally and ethically problematic position. Healthcare is essential for the ability to exercise and enjoy all other rights. Without access to medical care, people cannot fully participate in society, express themselves freely, or practice their faith. This is particularly true for chronic conditions and disabilities, which require ongoing care to manage. Ensuring healthcare access is not about forcing others to labor, but about recognizing the equal dignity and worth of all people, regardless of their health status or income.

In conclusion, the argument that individuals do not have a right to free healthcare because it requires labor and taxpayer funding is rooted in flawed assumptions about the work ethic of recipients and the nature of rights. Healthcare access is essential for full participation in society and the exercise of all other rights. Rather than viewing healthcare as a privilege for those who can afford it, we must recognize the inherent dignity of all people and work towards a system that ensures access to quality care for all, regardless of income or social status.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Innovation Paradox: Why Basic Security Fuels Progress

  The Innovation Paradox: Why Basic Security Fuels Progress When I was a child, I had everything I needed - a home, food, education, and medical care when I got sick. This security didn't make me lazy. Instead, it gave me the foundation to learn, grow, and imagine. This simple truth holds a powerful lesson for how we should structure our society. Some argue that removing the struggle for survival would kill innovation. They paint a picture of a world where, freed from necessity, humans would stagnate in comfortable mediocrity. But this argument fundamentally misunderstands both human nature and the real barriers to innovation in our current system. The cruel irony is that the very conditions supposedly driving innovation - constant financial pressure, expensive healthcare, crushing student debt, and housing insecurity - are actually suffocating it. How can someone innovate when they're working multiple jobs just to keep a roof over their head? How can they take the entrep...
Post a Comment
Read more

masculinity

Masculinity   Is masculinity dead? Is it the fault of some feminist or gay agenda? Was it caused by the bun-wearing guys with lattes and avocado toasts? Was it due to the unholy atheists? Of course not. But there are unfortunately a lot of people who think this way, especially those who believe that masculinity is really on the decline. But is it really? Some people want there to be a single mold for men: tough, rugged, thick-skinned, fearless, always pushing himself to the limit, willing to die for his country, willing to provide for his wife and children, believing in God, being heterosexual, peeing while standing, and rejecting anything deemed feminine. Who fits this mold? Very few men do. And here's the thing: most men never fit that mold, nor had they ever. Throughout history and across cultures, masculinity has always been far more diverse and nuanced than modern critics would have us believe. In ancient Greece, for philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, masculinity was deepl...
Post a Comment
Read more

What Really Scares Me (And What Doesn’t)

  What Really Scares Me (And What Doesn’t) By Tim Friday People talk a lot about what they fear—things like ghosts, flying, spiders. But my fears are simpler. More grounded. Real. I fear dog attacks. I’ve been attacked before, more than once, without provocation. The worst part isn’t just the trauma of the bite or the shock—it’s the way people defend it. They say things like, “It must’ve sensed something,” or “Dogs only attack if provoked.” As if I deserved it. That gaslighting hurts worse than the teeth. I fear car crashes. I’ve already been in a few. Minor, maybe, by insurance standards, but not by mine. I know what that impact feels like. The snap of the seatbelt. The sound of metal folding in on itself. I’ve had close calls too—so close I thought, This might be it. That terror doesn’t fade. It lingers under my skin when I drive. I fear being assaulted. That should be a no-brainer. And yes, even men like me get assaulted. I’ve been hit, shoved, screamed at, threatened—u...
Post a Comment
Read more