Skip to main content

male and female victim.

 let's imagine that there is a male driver. He is driving a car. A man and a woman are walking on the sidewalk. He drove up on the sidewalk and ran them both over. Both are alive but are badly injured.


Now, in this scenario, many people came to help. Who do they turn their attention to? The woman. Because we focused so much on caring about women (Which isn't wrong), but we ignored the male victim.


The news media would say, "Two victims were hit by a car, one is a female." They would focus on the female victim.


What happens to the male victim? He gets no attention, no support. Even when he is taken to the hospital too, no media want anything to do with him.


Especially when the driver is himself a man.


"It is so typical! All men are violent!" There would be outcries and screams about how men are the problem.


The male victim tries to say, "I was hit by the car too."


They would tell him these things:


"Stop distracting the issue from the REAL victims!"

"It's the fault of the patriarchy, you men need to do better!"

"You deserved it."

"Women have it worse!"

"Now you know how women feel!"


How is it ok to treat him like this? They were both injured in the accident. The fault lies with the man who drove his car into them both. Men are not responsible for men's behaviors. 


Providing support and being compassionate to male victims does not dismiss female victims. This is not a zero-sum game, it's not a one-upmanship. We will not be able to fix the problems by blaming men and putting all the problems onto men, "It's all your fault, you fix this!"


Now let's imagine the same scenario, except the driver is now a woman. 


This time, the man is blamed for her actions.


"What did you do to make her do this?"

"Men drove her to this."


or 


"She's mentally ill, she needs help."

"She doesn't know what she was doing!"

"She was the victim!"


How is any of this scenario ok?


When you try to point this out to feminists, they would try to shut you down.


"There are men going into women's shelters, prisons, and bathrooms!"


As if that justifies ignoring and belittling male victims. 


or, "Men have systematically oppressed women for thousands of years!"


Ignoring that few men had power, there are women who have power as well and the majority of men were not powerful rulers. Men were, by the vast majority likely to be "peasants" "merchants" or workers. 


No matter how you slice it, men are always blamed, men are always ignored and male victims get shunted aside and told to be quiet. 


So in these scenarios, it would be best to provide support to both victims. No more shunting victims aside or blaming the gender. we should look at what the problems are and how we can solve this, but first we need to stop with blame.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Really Scares Me (And What Doesn’t)

  What Really Scares Me (And What Doesn’t) By Tim Friday People talk a lot about what they fear—things like ghosts, flying, spiders. But my fears are simpler. More grounded. Real. I fear dog attacks. I’ve been attacked before, more than once, without provocation. The worst part isn’t just the trauma of the bite or the shock—it’s the way people defend it. They say things like, “It must’ve sensed something,” or “Dogs only attack if provoked.” As if I deserved it. That gaslighting hurts worse than the teeth. I fear car crashes. I’ve already been in a few. Minor, maybe, by insurance standards, but not by mine. I know what that impact feels like. The snap of the seatbelt. The sound of metal folding in on itself. I’ve had close calls too—so close I thought, This might be it. That terror doesn’t fade. It lingers under my skin when I drive. I fear being assaulted. That should be a no-brainer. And yes, even men like me get assaulted. I’ve been hit, shoved, screamed at, threatened—u...

access denied, because your pain isn't "severe" enough to care!!

  When “Not Severe Enough” Means No Help: The Cruelty of Our Healthcare System I was driving for Uber one day, giving a ride to a woman who needed help as she was in a lot of pain and misery, going from one motel to another, trying to get home and everything. Somewhere between the traffic lights, she started telling me her story as she cried her heart out. She told me about the people she’s lost, friends, family members, people she cared about deeply. About her own health struggles and the endless search for help that never came. About sitting in waiting rooms, calling doctors, begging for treatment, only to be told again and again that her condition wasn’t severe enough . That phrase— not severe enough —still haunts me. Because it means denied care , it means ignored pain , it means forgotten humanity . This isn’t just one person’s story. It’s the story of millions. Of people living with chronic illness, disabilities, mental health struggles, and daily pain that doesn’t fit...

defund the police? bad idea with good intention.

  How to Ruin a Good Idea in Three Words or Less: The “Defund the Police” Chronicles By [Your Name] Ah yes, 2020. The year everything was on fire—literally and metaphorically—and someone, somewhere, thought, “Hey, you know what this moment of national panic needs? A slogan that sounds like we want to throw every cop into the sun.” Enter: DEFUND. THE. POLICE. Was the goal nuanced and thoughtful? Yes. Was the branding the equivalent of giving nuance a lobotomy and shoving it on Twitter? Also yes.  The Intent Was Pure. Like a Labrador in a Protest Vest. Let’s be clear: the people who came up with “Defund the Police” weren’t sitting in a cave plotting the downfall of society. They had a solid point: Maybe armed officers shouldn’t be responding to mental health crises. Maybe we could reduce crime by addressing poverty, addiction, and homelessness . Maybe we shouldn’t give local PDs more military gear than a Marvel villain. That’s not crazy. That’s just common s...