Skip to main content

male and female victim.

 let's imagine that there is a male driver. He is driving a car. A man and a woman are walking on the sidewalk. He drove up on the sidewalk and ran them both over. Both are alive but are badly injured.


Now, in this scenario, many people came to help. Who do they turn their attention to? The woman. Because we focused so much on caring about women (Which isn't wrong), but we ignored the male victim.


The news media would say, "Two victims were hit by a car, one is a female." They would focus on the female victim.


What happens to the male victim? He gets no attention, no support. Even when he is taken to the hospital too, no media want anything to do with him.


Especially when the driver is himself a man.


"It is so typical! All men are violent!" There would be outcries and screams about how men are the problem.


The male victim tries to say, "I was hit by the car too."


They would tell him these things:


"Stop distracting the issue from the REAL victims!"

"It's the fault of the patriarchy, you men need to do better!"

"You deserved it."

"Women have it worse!"

"Now you know how women feel!"


How is it ok to treat him like this? They were both injured in the accident. The fault lies with the man who drove his car into them both. Men are not responsible for men's behaviors. 


Providing support and being compassionate to male victims does not dismiss female victims. This is not a zero-sum game, it's not a one-upmanship. We will not be able to fix the problems by blaming men and putting all the problems onto men, "It's all your fault, you fix this!"


Now let's imagine the same scenario, except the driver is now a woman. 


This time, the man is blamed for her actions.


"What did you do to make her do this?"

"Men drove her to this."


or 


"She's mentally ill, she needs help."

"She doesn't know what she was doing!"

"She was the victim!"


How is any of this scenario ok?


When you try to point this out to feminists, they would try to shut you down.


"There are men going into women's shelters, prisons, and bathrooms!"


As if that justifies ignoring and belittling male victims. 


or, "Men have systematically oppressed women for thousands of years!"


Ignoring that few men had power, there are women who have power as well and the majority of men were not powerful rulers. Men were, by the vast majority likely to be "peasants" "merchants" or workers. 


No matter how you slice it, men are always blamed, men are always ignored and male victims get shunted aside and told to be quiet. 


So in these scenarios, it would be best to provide support to both victims. No more shunting victims aside or blaming the gender. we should look at what the problems are and how we can solve this, but first we need to stop with blame.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Innovation Paradox: Why Basic Security Fuels Progress

  The Innovation Paradox: Why Basic Security Fuels Progress When I was a child, I had everything I needed - a home, food, education, and medical care when I got sick. This security didn't make me lazy. Instead, it gave me the foundation to learn, grow, and imagine. This simple truth holds a powerful lesson for how we should structure our society. Some argue that removing the struggle for survival would kill innovation. They paint a picture of a world where, freed from necessity, humans would stagnate in comfortable mediocrity. But this argument fundamentally misunderstands both human nature and the real barriers to innovation in our current system. The cruel irony is that the very conditions supposedly driving innovation - constant financial pressure, expensive healthcare, crushing student debt, and housing insecurity - are actually suffocating it. How can someone innovate when they're working multiple jobs just to keep a roof over their head? How can they take the entrep...

masculinity

Masculinity   Is masculinity dead? Is it the fault of some feminist or gay agenda? Was it caused by the bun-wearing guys with lattes and avocado toasts? Was it due to the unholy atheists? Of course not. But there are unfortunately a lot of people who think this way, especially those who believe that masculinity is really on the decline. But is it really? Some people want there to be a single mold for men: tough, rugged, thick-skinned, fearless, always pushing himself to the limit, willing to die for his country, willing to provide for his wife and children, believing in God, being heterosexual, peeing while standing, and rejecting anything deemed feminine. Who fits this mold? Very few men do. And here's the thing: most men never fit that mold, nor had they ever. Throughout history and across cultures, masculinity has always been far more diverse and nuanced than modern critics would have us believe. In ancient Greece, for philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, masculinity was deepl...

What Really Scares Me (And What Doesn’t)

  What Really Scares Me (And What Doesn’t) By Tim Friday People talk a lot about what they fear—things like ghosts, flying, spiders. But my fears are simpler. More grounded. Real. I fear dog attacks. I’ve been attacked before, more than once, without provocation. The worst part isn’t just the trauma of the bite or the shock—it’s the way people defend it. They say things like, “It must’ve sensed something,” or “Dogs only attack if provoked.” As if I deserved it. That gaslighting hurts worse than the teeth. I fear car crashes. I’ve already been in a few. Minor, maybe, by insurance standards, but not by mine. I know what that impact feels like. The snap of the seatbelt. The sound of metal folding in on itself. I’ve had close calls too—so close I thought, This might be it. That terror doesn’t fade. It lingers under my skin when I drive. I fear being assaulted. That should be a no-brainer. And yes, even men like me get assaulted. I’ve been hit, shoved, screamed at, threatened—u...